Article by Support Our Sharks (Updated: 01 October 2012)
The WA Premier Collin Barnett and Fisheries Minister Norman Moore
recently announced that the Government will allocate
$6.85-million for its 'shark mitigation' strategy, in response
to the recent wave of
sharks bite incidents in the state. We applaud the Government
for allocating $4 million to applied research and tagging programs,
as this is certainly the best way to understand the root cause of
shark bite fatalities and deter any future incidents.
In addition, they have also allocated $500,000 to Surf
Lifesaving WA to bolster beach safety and $150,000 for additional
community awareness programs.
We believe that on the ground work with the local community
informing people of the potential risks involved with entering the
ocean and how to avoid dangerous situations is a key factor in
improving public safety and reducing shark bite incidents.
All of the measures mentioned above are extremely positive in terms
of both public safety and shark conservation. However,
controversially, the Government has also allocated $2 million for a
new service to allow the Department of Fisheries to track, catch
and, if necessary, destroy sharks (species not specified) in close
proximity to beachgoers, including setting drum lines if a danger is
posed. The Government is clearly under extreme pressure from a
small sector in WA (given a magnified voice by the local media)
whom believes that removing white sharks will make the ocean a safer
place, even though the WA people are overwhelmingly
against shark culling.
According to
Shark Alarm, a group that monitors
shark activity in Australian waters, the state government’s decision
may actually cause more damage than good, “People who love the
ocean, and who respect that this species is endangered will now most
likely refuse to report the sighting at all, in fear that the shark
will be killed by the government”.
In fact, during the latter half of the 20th century, shark culling
was carried out in
Hawaii in an attempt to make the waters safer. From 1959 to
1976, the state of Hawaii culled 4,668 sharks including 554 tiger
sharks. No significant decrease in the rate of shark bites was
detected. Yet here we are 40 years on, again proposing the use of a
failed strategy. Pre-emptively killing sharks is simply an
appeasement tactic, one of emotion rather than of real science.
The WA Government is understandably in a difficult situation because
every shark bite incident brings the same small group of
ill-informed people to the public’s attention by the local media
looking for a story that will sell.
Even though all the polls (1;2;3)
overwhelmingly suggest that people are against killing sharks,
sections of the media choose to ignore this and effectively
manipulate the views of the WA people to sell their story.
It is therefore no surprise that the WA Government has issued
an order to kill sharks if they pose an imminent danger/threat, as
they probably believe that this is what the WA people want.
WA has had
legislation (Section 7[2] of the Fish Resource management Act
1994)
in place for many years that enables the
Department of Fisheries to kill sharks after a fatality, if they can
properly identify the individual involved, yet to date they have
never acted upon this legislation.
Now they have the option of killing sharks before an incident
and so time will tell if they will actually act upon this or whether
this is really just an appeasement tactic to satisfy the loud voice
of a small group of people and finally bring this issue to a close.
We previously ran a successful campaign
against shark culling in WA which gathered the support of over
100 of the world’s leading shark experts and over 19,000 members of
the public. We stand by our campaign and reiterate that investment
in research, and involvement with the local community on how to
avoid coming in contact with potentially dangerous sharks, are key
to preventing future unwanted encounters.
Finally we encourage you to respectfully share your views with
Premier Barnett and
Fisheries Minister
Moore on what you think about their new proposal as they are,
after-all, working for your interests. These leaders need to
be informed of your views on the matter so they can act accordingly,
otherwise they have only the one-sided and potentially biased view
portrayed by the media.
For further impact we encourage you to check out our petitions page and add your support to relevant campaigns.
-----------------------------------------------
Please share your thoughts about this article below.
Other Interesting Articles:
Disclaimer
Support Our Sharks posts articles and material
prepared by other organisations and individuals not affiliated with
Support Our Sharks for educational purposes. Support Our Sharks does not
necessarily agree with the opinions expressed in such material. Support
Our Sharks also provides links from this site to the websites of
featured news articles above for informational purposes only. The links
do not imply an endorsement by Support Our Sharks of these articles or
the content of their respective web pages.